网络赌博-网络赌博举报官方网站

En

向凡:An Examination of the Power of the Central People’s Government to Issue Directives to the Chief Executive under the Hong Kong Basic Law

來(lái)源: 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2024-01-17 20:00 點(diǎn)擊數(shù): Views

向凡:An Examination of the Power of the Central People’s Government to Issue Directives to the Chief Executive under the Hong Kong Basic Law

期刊名:《Hong Kong Law Journal》(SSCI),2023年第53卷第3期

ABSTRACT:This article explores the power of the Central People’s Government (CPG) to issue directives to the Chief Executive (CE) under art 48(8) of the Hong Kong Basic Law (BL). It suggests tthat the CPG’s power of issuing directives to the CE bears some resemblance to both the British Crown’s power to issue directives to the Hong Kong governor and the People’s Republic of China State Council’s power to give decisions and orders to the local government. However, attributing the origin of the CPG’s power solely to either of them is challenging due to the differing scope involved. The article also notes that art 48(8) of the BL had never undergone any textual changes during the entire drafting process; there were some controversies surrounding the scope of the CPG’s directives and their legal effects, however. Through normative analysis, this article resolves four ambiguities in art 48(8), namely, which organ of the central authorities should be the CPG, what kinds of affairs could be instructed by the CPG through a directive, whether CE has the duty to implement every and each of CPG’s directives and whether Hong Kong’s courts could exercise judicial control over CE’s implementation of directives. Furthermore, it differentiates between issuing a directive and a letter to the CE by the CPG. The article argues that art 48(8) of the BL empowers the CPG to supervise Hong Kong’s exercise of administrative power, but it should not be seen as a licence for unrestricted use. It recommends the cautious use of directive power by the CPG to uphold the “executive-led” principle and respect Hong Kong’s autonomy.


(來(lái)源 深圳大學(xué)港澳基本法研究中心)

大发888官网sscbcgsesb| 百家乐群dmwd| 24山坐向| 长兴县| 大发百家乐现金| 网络百家乐官网| 大发888网页版游戏| 百家乐路单下注| 百家乐官网怎么样玩| 大发888体育和娱乐| 罗盘24山度数| 百家乐官网赢钱海立方| 德州扑克技巧视频| 电子百家乐作假| 大发888娱乐85战神版| 曼哈顿百家乐娱乐城| 百家乐公试打法| 百家乐官网骰盅规则| 太阳城百家乐官网赌博害人 | 财神娱乐城怎么样| 百家乐对子的玩法| 百家乐官网最低投注| 大发888玩哪个能赢钱| 百家乐的弱点| 金世豪百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 聚龍社百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 广州太阳城大酒店| 伯爵百家乐娱乐网| 太原百家乐官网招聘| 免费百家乐官网娱乐城| 射阳县| 捕鱼棋牌游戏| 大发888电话多少| 百家乐大娱乐场开户注册| 百家乐扑克筹码| 百家乐视频游戏大厅| 金杯百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐官网mediacorp| 有百家乐官网的棋牌游戏| 百家乐官网上分器定位器| 百家乐官网三多注码法|